11. ICAIL 2007: Stanford, California, USA

Evidential reasoning

• Floris J. Bex, Henry Prakken, Bart Verheij:
  Formalising argumentative story-based analysis of evidence. 1-10
  
• Susan W. van den Braak, Gerard Vreeswijk, Henry Prakken:
  AVERs: an argument visualization tool for representing stories about evidence. 11-15
  
• Jeroen Keppens:
  Towards qualitative approaches to Bayesian evidential reasoning. 17-25
  

Law and the semantic web

• Radboud Winkels, Alexander Boer, Erik Hupkes:
  Legal atlas: access to legal sources through maps. 27-36
  
• Martine Boonk, Frances M. T. Brazier, David de Groot, Maarten van Stekelenburg, Anja Oskamp, Martijn Warnier:
  Conditions for access and use of legal document retrieval web services. 37-41
  

Legal ontologies

• Gianmaria Ajani, Leonardo Lesmo, Guido Boella, Alessandro Mazzei, Piercarlo Rossi:
  Terminological and ontological analysis of European directives: multilinguism in law. 43-48
  
• Nuria Casellas, Pompeu Casanovas, Joan-Josep Vallbé, Marta Poblet, Mercedes Blázquez, Jesús Contreras, José Manuel López Cobo, V. Richard Benjamins:
  Semantic enhancement for legal information retrieval: Iuriservice performance. 49-57
  
• Chin Pang Cheng, Gloria T. Lau, Kincho H. Law:
  Mapping regulations to industry-specific taxonomies. 59-63
  
• Nadia Nadah, Mélanie Dulong de Rosnay, Bruno Bachimont:
  Licensing digital content with a generic ontology: escaping from the jungle of rights expression languages. 65-69
  

Game theory

• Elisa Burato, Matteo Cristani:
  Contract clause negotiation by game theory. 71-80
  
• Bram Roth, Régis Riveret, Antonino Rotolo, Guido Governatori:
  Strategic argumentation: a game theoretical investigation. 81-90
  
• Hajime Yoshino:
  Research abstracts 1: Logical structure of change of legal relations and its representation in legal knowledge base system. 91-92
  

Research abstracts 1

• Isa Mara da Rosa Alves, Rove Luiza de Oliveira Chishman, Paulo Miguel Torres, Duarte Quaresma:
  The construction of a juridical ontology. 93-94
  
• Elisabeth M. Uijttenbroek, Michel C. A. Klein, Arno R. Lodder, Frank van Harmelen:
  Case law retrieval by concept search and visualization. 95-96
  

Modelling legal argument

• Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor:
  Formalising arguments about the burden of persuasion. 97-106
  
• Katie Atkinson, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon:
  Argumentation and standards of proof. 107-116
  
• Thomas F. Gordon:
  Constructing arguments with a computational model of an argumentation scheme for legal rules: interpreting legal rules as reasoning policies. 117-121
  

Legal information retrieval

• Paul Zhang, Lavanya Koppaka:
  Semantics-based legal citation network. 123-130
  
• Enrico Francesconi, Ginevra Peruginelli:
  Searching and retrieving legal literature through automated semantic indexing. 131-139
  
• Jason R. Baron, Paul Thompson:
  The search problem posed by large heterogeneous data sets in litigation: possible future approaches to research. 141-147
  

Modelling aspects of law

• Luca Compagna, Paul El Khoury, Fabio Massacci, Reshma Thomas, Nicola Zannone:
  How to capture, model, and verify the knowledge of legal, security, and privacy experts: a pattern-based approach. 149-153
  
• Guido Governatori, Antonino Rotolo, Régis Riveret, Monica Palmirani, Giovanni Sartor:
  Variants of temporal defeasible logics for modelling norm modifications. 155-159
  
• Layman E. Allen, Adam W. Tury:
  NewMINT interpretation assistance system: United States Constitution First Amendment's initial 1344 interpretations. 161-165
  

Agents

• Pieter Dijkstra, Henry Prakken, Kees de Vey Mestdagh:
  An implementation of norm-based agent negotiation. 167-175
  
• Martijn Warnier, Frances M. T. Brazier, Martin Apistola, Anja Oskamp:
  Towards automatic identification of completeness and consistency in digital dossiers. 177-181
  
• Lucas Drumond, Rosario Girardi, Adriana Leite:
  Architectural design of a multi-agent recommender system for the legal domain. 183-187
  

Research abstracts 2

• Innar Liiv, Anton Vedeshin, Ermo Täks:
  Visualization and structure analysis of legislative acts: a case study on the law of obligations. 189-190
  
• Mohammad Al Hasan, W. Scott Spangler:
  Assessing patent value through advanced text analysis. 191-192
  
• Harry Surden, Michael R. Genesereth, Bret Logu:
  Representational complexity in law. 193-194
  

Various

• Laurens Mommers, Wouter Koelewijn, Hugo Kielman:
  Understanding the law: a method for legal knowledge dissemination. 195-203
  
• Yueh-Hsuan Weng, Chien-Hsun Chen, Chuen-Tsai Sun:
  The legal crisis of next generation robots: on safety intelligence. 205-209
  
• Danièle Bourcier, Pierre Mazzega:
  Toward measures of complexity in legal systems. 211-215
  

NLP and text mining

• L. Thorne McCarty:
  Deep semantic interpretations of legal texts. 217-224
  
• Marie-Francine Moens, Erik Boiy, Raquel Mochales Palau, Chris Reed:
  Automatic detection of arguments in legal texts. 225-230
  
• Jack G. Conrad, Frank Schilder:
  Opinion mining in legal blogs. 231-236
  

ODR

• John Zeleznikow, Emilia Bellucci, Uri J. Schild, Geraldine Mackenzie:
  Bargaining in the shadow of the law - using utility functions to support legal negotiation. 237-246
  
• Pamela N. Gray, Xenogene Gray, John Zeleznikow:
  Negotiating logic: for richer or poorer. 247-251
  

Information retrieval 2

• Christopher Dozier, Ravi Kondadadi, Khalid Al-Kofahi, Mark Chaudhary, Xi S. Guo:
  Fast tagging of medical terms in legal text. 253-260
  
• Jack G. Conrad, Edward L. Raymond:
  Essential deduplication functions for transactional databases in law firms. 261-270
  

Tools for argumentation

• Kevin D. Ashley, Niels Pinkwart, Collin Lynch, Vincent Aleven:
  Learning by diagramming Supreme Court oral arguments. 271-275
  
• Jobien Sombekke, Tom M. van Engers, Henry Prakken:
  Argumentation structures in legal dossiers. 277-281
  

Research abstracts 3

• Jenny Eriksson Lundström, Andreas Hamfelt, Jørgen Fischer Nilsson:
  A rule-sceptic characterization of acceptable legal arguments. 283-284
  
• Enrique Cáceres:
  A constructivist model for the judicial determination of facts. 285-286
  
• Ugo Pagallo, Giancarlo Ruffo:
  P2P systems in legal networks: another "small world" case. 287-288
  
• Francisco Andrade, Paulo Novais, José Neves:
  Divergence between will and declaration in intelligent agent contracting. 289-290
  

Last update Sat May 25 03:03:04 2013 CET by the DBLP Team — Data released under the ODC-BY 1.0 license — See also our legal information page