12. ICAIL 2009:
Barcelona, Spain
The 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Proceedings of the Conference, June 8-12, 2009, Barcelona, Spain.
ACM 2009, ISBN 978-1-60558-597-0
Research papers
- Kevin D. Ashley:
Ontological requirements for analogical, teleological, and hypothetical legal reasoning.
1-10

- Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Thomas F. Gordon:
Isomorphism and argumentation.
11-20

- Raquel Mochales Palau, Aagje Ieven:
Creating an argumentation corpus: do theories apply to real arguments?: a case study on the legal argumentation of the ECHR.
21-30

- Emile de Maat, Radboud Winkels:
A next step towards automated modelling of sources of law.
31-39

- Pier-Luigi Spinosa, Gerardo Giardiello, Manola Cherubini, Simone Marchi, Giulia Venturi, Simonetta Montemagni:
NLP-based metadata extraction for legal text consolidation.
40-49

- Alessandro Mazzei, Daniele P. Radicioni, Raffaella Brighi:
NLP-based extraction of modificatory provisions semantics.
50-57

- Sindhu Joseph, Henry Prakken:
Coherence-driven argumentation to norm consensus.
58-67

- Alexander Artikis:
Formalising dynamic protocols for open agent systems.
68-77

- Nadjet Bouayad-Agha, Gerard Casamayor, Gabriela Ferraro, Simon Mille, Vanesa Vidal, Leo Wanner:
Improving the comprehension of legal documentation: the case of patent claims.
78-87

- Eneldo Loza Mencía:
Segmentation of legal documents.
88-97

- Raquel Mochales Palau, Marie-Francine Moens:
Argumentation mining: the detection, classification and structure of arguments in text.
98-107

- Giovanni Sartor, Michel Rudnianski, Antonino Rotolo, Régis Riveret, Eunate Mayor:
Why lawyers are nice (or nasty): a game-theoretical argumentation exercise.
108-117

- Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Sanjay Modgil:
Case law in extended argumentation frameworks.
118-127

- Phan Minh Dung, Phan Minh Thang, Nguyen Duy Hung:
Modular argumentation for modelling legal doctrines of performance relief.
128-136

- Thomas F. Gordon, Douglas Walton:
Legal reasoning with argumentation schemes.
137-146

- Tossapon Boongoen, Qiang Shen:
Intelligent hybrid approach to false identity detection.
147-156

- Dino Pedreschi, Salvatore Ruggieri, Franco Turini:
Integrating induction and deduction for finding evidence of discrimination.
157-166

- Jack G. Conrad, Jochen L. Leidner, Frank Schilder, Ravi Kondadadi:
Query-based opinion summarization for legal blog entries.
167-176

- John Zeleznikow, Brooke Abrahams:
Incorporating issues of fairness into development of a multi-agent negotiation support system.
177-184

- Rinke Hoekstra, Radboud Winkels, Erik Hupkes:
Reasoning with spatial plans on the semantic web.
185-193

- Christopher Hogan, Robert S. Bauer, Dan Brassil:
Human-aided computer cognition for e-discovery.
194-201

- Marc Lauritsen, Thomas F. Gordon:
Toward a general theory of document modeling.
202-211

Research abstracts
- Floris Bex, Katie Atkinson:
A proposal for evidential reasoning about motives.
212-213

- Vern R. Walker:
Plausibility schemas: templates for legal factfinding.
214-215

- Mary-Anne Williams:
Evidence transmutations: gathering admissible evidence using belief revision.
216-217

- Cristian Prisacariu, Gerardo Schneider:
Abstract specification of legal contracts.
218-219

- Tomasz Zurek, Emil Kruk:
Supporting of legal reasoning for cases which are not strictly regulated by law.
220-221

- Collin Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven:
Toward assessing law students' argument diagrams.
222-223

- Stijn Colen, Fokie Cnossen, Bart Verheij:
How much logical structure is helpful in content-based argumentation software for legal case solving?
224-225

- Jan van Dijk, Sunil Choenni, Frans Leeuw:
Analyzing a complaint database by means of a genetic-based data mining algorithm.
226-227

- Alzbeta Krausová, Fabio Massacci, Ayda Saïdane:
How to capture and use legal patterns in IT.
228-229

- Ir. R. A. Hilhorst, Tom M. van Engers:
e-dossier at the Dutch Council of State: design, implementation and lessons learned.
230-231

- Monica Palmirani, Luca Cervone, Fabio Vitali:
Legal metadata interchange framework to match CEN metalex.
232-233

- Michael J. Bommarito II, Daniel Martin Katz, Jon Zelner:
Law as a seamless web?: comparison of various network representations of the United States Supreme Court corpus (1791-2005).
234-235

- Pierre Mazzega, Danièle Bourcier, Romain Boulet:
The network of French legal codes.
236-237

- Raffaella Brighi, Monica Palmirani:
Legal text analysis of the modification provisions: a pattern oriented approach.
238-239

- Matthias Grabmair, Kevin D. Ashley:
Using critical questions to disambiguate and formalize statutory provisions.
240-241

Last update Sat May 18 18:38:52 2013
CET by the DBLP Team —
Data released under the ODC-BY 1.0 license — See also our legal information page