13. ICAIL 2011: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Kevin D. Ashley, Tom M. van Engers (Eds.): The 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Proceedings of the Conference, June 6-10, 2011, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. ACM 2011 ISBN 978-1-4503-0755-0
Adam Zachary Wyner, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Katie Atkinson: Towards formalising argumentation about legal cases. 1-10
Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Henry Prakken, Wietske Visser: Argument schemes for two-phase democratic deliberation. 21-30
Guido Governatori: On the relationship between Carneades and Defeasible Logic. 31-40
John F. Horty: Reasons and precedent. 41-50
Thomas F. Gordon: Analyzing open source license compatibility issues with Carneades. 51-55
Nancy L. Green: Causal argumentation schemes to support sense-making in clinical genetics and law. 56-60
Michal Chalamish, Dov M. Gabbay, Uri J. Schild: Intelligent evaluation of evidence using Wigmore diagrams. 61-65
Susan W. van den Braak, Anne Sonnenschein, Sunil Choenni, Paul R. Smit: A method for explaining and predicting trends: an application to the Dutch justice system. 66-70
Régis Riveret, Antonino Rotolo, Giuseppe Contissa, Giovanni Sartor, Wamberto Vasconcelos: Temporal accommodation of legal argumentation. 71-80
Katie Atkinson, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Dan Cartwright, Adam Zachary Wyner: Semantic models for policy deliberation. 81-90
Jenny Eriksson Lundström, Giacomo Aceto, Andreas Hamfelt: Towards a dynamic metalogic implementation of legal argumentation. 91-95
Tomasz Zurek: Modelling of a fortiori reasoning. 96-100
Michal Araszkiewicz: Analogy, similarity and factors. 101-105
Marc Lauritsen: Intelligent tools for managing legal choices. 106-110
Tommaso Agnoloni, Enrico Francesconi: Modelling semantic profiles in legislative documents for enhanced norm accessibility. 111-115
Mihai Surdeanu, Ramesh Nallapati, George Gregory, Joshua Walker, Christopher D. Manning: Risk analysis for intellectual property litigation. 116-120
Hajime Yoshino: The systematization of law in terms of the validity. 121-125
Robert C. Richards Jr., Thomas R. Bruce: Adapting specialized legal metadata to the digital environment: the code of federal regulations parallel table of authorities and rules. 126-130
John Zeleznikow, Emilia Bellucci: Classifying online dispute resolution through a comparison of family mediation and the Israel - Palestinian conflict. 136-140
Jeroen Keppens: On extracting arguments from Bayesian network representations of evidential reasoning. 141-150
Matthias Grabmair, Kevin D. Ashley: Facilitating case comparison using value judgments and intermediate legal concepts. 161-170
Alexander Boer, Tom M. van Engers: An agent-based legal knowledge acquisition methodology for agile public administration. 171-180
Matthew Carey: Modeling authority commitments in two search and seizure cases. 181-188
Monica Palmirani, Marcello Ceci, Daniele P. Radicioni, Alessandro Mazzei: FrameNet model of the suspension of norms. 189-193
Brooke Abrahams, Peter Condliffe, John Zeleznikow: Using an OWL ontology to support legal negotiation about owners corporation disputes. 194-198
Michael Curtotti, Eric McCreath: A corpus of Australian contract language: description, profiling and analysis. 199-208
Max R. Kimbrough, Steven O. Kimbrough, Priscilla Murphy: On using text analytics for event studies. 209-218
Cameron Hughes, Tracey Hughes, Alina Lazar: Discovering coherence and justification clusters in digital transcripts using epistemic analysis. 219-223
Davide Carneiro, Paulo Novais, Francisco Andrade, José Neves: Retrieving information in online dispute resolution platforms: a hybrid method. 224-228
Bruce M. McLaren, Kevin D. Ashley: Can temporal representation and reasoning make a difference in automated legal reasoning?: lessons from an AI-based ethical reasoner. 229-238
Jack G. Conrad, Christopher Dozier, Hugo Molina-Salgado, Merine Thomas, Sriharsha Veeramachaneni: Public record aggregation using semi-supervised entity resolution. 239-248



