5. ICAIL 1995: College Park, Maryland, USA

Argumentation I

• Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor:
  On the Relation Between Legal Language and Legal Argument: Assumptions, Applicability and Dynamic Priorities. 1-10
  
• Jaap Hage:
  Teleological Reasoning in Reason-Based Logic. 11-20
  
• Ronald Prescott Loui:
  Hart's Critics on Defeasible Concepts and Ascriptivism. 21-30
  

Case-Based Reasoning

• Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley:
  Doing Things with Factors. 31-41
  
• Donald H. Berman, Carole D. Hafner:
  Understanding Precedents in a Temporal Context of Evolving Legal Doctrine. 42-51
  
• Edwina L. Rissland, Jody J. Daniels:
  A Hybrid CBR-IR Approach to Legal Information Retrieval. 52-61
  

Document Preparation

• Aspassia Daskalopulu, Marek J. Sergot:
  A Constraint-Driven System for Contract Assembly. 62-70
  
• Luuk Matthijssen:
  An Intelligent Interface for Legal Databases. 71-80
  
• Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Geof Staniford:
  PLAID: Proactive Legal Assistance. 81-88
  

Information Retrieval

• Neil Hutton, A. Patterson, Cyrus Tata:
  Decision Support for Sentencing in a Common Law Jurisdiction. 89-95
  
• Philip Greenspun, Marc Lauritsen:
  Making Way for Intelligence in Case Space. 96-103
  

Legislative Drafting

• Jorgen S. Svensson:
  Enhancing the Applicability of Empirical Data Using Legal Knowledge Based Systems. 104-111
  
• Radboud Winkels, Nienke den Haan:
  Automated Legislative Drafting: Generating Paraphrases of Legislation. 112-118
  

Legal Concepts

• Erich Schweighofer, Werner Winiwarter, Dieter Merkl:
  Information Filtering: The Computation of Similarities in Large Corpora of Legal Texts. 119-126
  
• Edwina L. Rissland, M. Timur Friedman:
  Detecting Change in Legal Concepts. 127-136
  

Argumentation II

• Pierre St-Vincent, Daniel Poulin, Paul Bratley:
  A Computational Framework for Dialectical Reasoning. 137-145
  
• Arno R. Lodder, Aimée Herczog:
  DiaLaw: A Dialogical Framework for Modeling Legal Reasoning. 146-155
  
• Arthur M. Farley, Kathleen Freeman:
  Burden of Proof in Legal Argumentation. 156-164
  
• Henry Prakken:
  From Logic to Dialectics in Legal Argument. 165-174
  

ANNs, GAs and Fuzzy Logic

• Anandeep Pannu:
  Using Genetic Algorithms to Inductively Reason with Cases in the Legal Domain. 175-184
  
• John Zeleznikow, Andrew Stranieri:
  The Split-Up System: Integrating Neural Networks and Rule-Based Reasoning in the Legal Domain. 185-194
  
• Lothar Philipps:
  Just Decisions Using Multiple Criteria Or: Who Gets the Porsche? An Application of Ronald R. Yager's Fuzzy Logic Method. 195-200
  

Normative Reasoning

• Laurence Cholvy, Frédéric Cuppens:
  Solving Normative Conflicts by Merging Roles. 201-209
  
• Henning Herrestad, Christen Krogh:
  Obligations Directed from Bearers to Counterparts. 210-218
  
• Layman E. Allen, Charles S. Saxon:
  Better Language, Better Thought, Better Communication: The A-Hohfeld Language for Legal Analysis. 219-228
  

Legal KBS

• Uri J. Schild:
  Intelligent Computer Systems for Criminal Sentencing. 229-238
  
• Henk de Bruijn, Radboud Winkels:
  Case Reconstruction Before Assessment. 239-245
  
• Ulrich Reimer, Andreas Margelisch:
  A Hybrid Knowledge Representation Approach to Reusability of Legal Knowledge Bases. 246-255
  
• Cees Groendijk, Maaike Tragter:
  MILIEU: A LKBS to Support Prosecution of Environmental Offenders. 256-265
  

Knowledge Representation

• Hajime Yoshino:
  The Systematization of Legal Meta-Inference. 266-275
  
• L. Thorne McCarty:
  An Implementation of Eisner v. Macomber. 276-286
  
• Katsumi Nitta, Masato Shibasaki, Tsuyoshi Sakata, Takahiro Yamaji, Wang Xianchang, Hiroshi Ohsaki, Satoshi Tojo, Iwao Kokubo, T. Anu Suzuki:
  New HELIC-II: A Software Tool for Legal Eeasoning. 287-296
  

• Timothy Arnold-Moore:
  Automatically Processing Amendments to Legislation. 297-306
  
• André Valente, Joost Breuker:
  ON-LINE: An Architecture for Modelling Legal Information. 307-315
  
• Bruce M. McLaren, Kevin D. Ashley:
  Context Sensitive Case Comparisons in Practical Ethics: Reasoning About Reasons. 316-325