Leila Amgoud

	2011
86		Leila Amgoud, Srdjan Vesic: A formal analysis of the outcomes of argumentation-based negotiations. AAMAS 2011: 1237-1238
85		Leila Amgoud, Srdjan Vesic: Two Roles of Preferences in Argumentation Frameworks. ECSQARU 2011: 86-97
84		Leila Amgoud, Srdjan Vesic: Basic Equivalence in Logic-Based Argumentation. ICTAI 2011: 613-620
83		Leila Amgoud, Philippe Besnard, Srdjan Vesic: Identifying the Core of Logic-Based Argumentation Systems. ICTAI 2011: 633-636
82		Leila Amgoud, Caroline Devred: Argumentation Frameworks as Constraint Satisfaction Problems. SUM 2011: 110-122
81		Leila Amgoud, Srdjan Vesic: On the Equivalence of Logic-Based Argumentation Systems. SUM 2011: 123-136
80		Leila Amgoud, Srdjan Vesic: A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 63(2): 149-183 (2011)
79		Leila Amgoud, Caroline Devred, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex: Generating possible intentions with constrained argumentation systems. Int. J. Approx. Reasoning 52(9): 1363-1391 (2011)
	2010
78		Leila Amgoud, Srdjan Vesic: Generalizing stable semantics by preferences. COMMA 2010: 39-50
77		Antonis C. Kakas, Leila Amgoud, Gabriele Kern-Isberner, Nicolas Maudet, Pavlos Moraitis: ABA: Argumentation Based Agents. ECAI 2010: 1005-1006
76		Jean-Rémi Bourguet, Leila Amgoud, Rallou Thomopoulos: Towards a Unified Model of Preference-Based Argumentation. FoIKS 2010: 326-344
75		Leila Amgoud, Srdjan Vesic: On the Role of Preferences in Argumentation Frameworks. ICTAI (1) 2010: 219-222
74		Leila Amgoud, Philippe Besnard: A Formal Analysis of Logic-Based Argumentation Systems. SUM 2010: 42-55
73		Leila Amgoud, Srdjan Vesic: Handling Inconsistency with Preference-Based Argumentation. SUM 2010: 56-69
	2009
72		Yannis Dimopoulos, Pavlos Moraitis, Leila Amgoud: Extending Argumentation to Make Good Decisions. ADT 2009: 225-236
71		Leila Amgoud, Florence Dupin de Saint-Cyr: Extracting the Core of a Persuasion Dialog to Evaluate Its Quality. ECSQARU 2009: 59-70
70		Leila Amgoud, Srdjan Vesic: On Revising Argumentation-Based Decision Systems. ECSQARU 2009: 71-82
69		Leila Amgoud, Srdjan Vesic: Repairing Preference-Based Argumentation Frameworks. IJCAI 2009: 665-670
68		Leila Amgoud, Philippe Besnard: Bridging the Gap between Abstract Argumentation Systems and Logic. SUM 2009: 12-27
67		Leila Amgoud, Henri Prade: Using arguments for making and explaining decisions. Artif. Intell. 173(3-4): 413-436 (2009)
	2008
66		Leila Amgoud, Caroline Devred, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex: A constrained argumentation system for practical reasoning. AAMAS (1) 2008: 429-436
65		Leila Amgoud, Caroline Devred, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex: A Constrained Argumentation System for Practical Reasoning. ArgMAS 2008: 37-56
64		Leila Amgoud, Florence Dupin de Saint-Cyr: On measuring persuasion dialogs quality. COMMA 2008: 13-24
63		Yannis Dimopoulos, Pavlos Moraitis, Leila Amgoud: Theoretical and Computational Properties of Preference-based Argumentation. ECAI 2008: 463-467
62		Yannis Dimopoulos, Pavlos Moraitis, Leila Amgoud: Characterizing the Outcomes of Argumentation-Based Integrative Negotiation. IAT 2008: 456-460
61		Leila Amgoud, Yannis Dimopoulos, Pavlos Moraitis: Making Decisions through Preference-Based Argumentation. KR 2008: 113-123
60		Leila Amgoud, Mathieu Serrurier: Agents that argue and explain classifications. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 16(2): 187-209 (2008)
59		Leila Amgoud, Claudette Cayrol, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex, P. Livet: On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 23(10): 1062-1093 (2008)
58		Leila Amgoud, Florence Dupin de Saint-Cyr: A new semantics for ACL based on commitments and penalties. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 23(3): 286-312 (2008)
	2007
57		Leila Amgoud, Yannis Dimopoulos, Pavlos Moraitis: A unified and general framework for argumentation-based negotiation. AAMAS 2007: 158
56		Leila Amgoud, Mathieu Serrurier: Arguing and explaining classifications. AAMAS 2007: 160
55		Leila Amgoud, Yannis Dimopoulos, Pavlos Moraitis: A General Framework for Argumentation-Based Negotiation. ArgMAS 2007: 1-17
54		Leila Amgoud, Mathieu Serrurier: Arguing and Explaining Classifications. ArgMAS 2007: 164-177
53		Leila Amgoud, Jean-François Bonnefon, Henri Prade: The Logical Handling of Threats, Rewards, Tips, and Warnings. ECSQARU 2007: 235-246
52		Leila Amgoud, Henri Prade: Formalizing Practical Reasoning Under Uncertainty: An Argumentation-Based Approach. IAT 2007: 189-195
51		V. S. Subrahmanian, Leila Amgoud: A General Framework for Reasoning about Inconsistency. IJCAI 2007: 599-504
50		Martin Caminada, Leila Amgoud: On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms. Artif. Intell. 171(5-6): 286-310 (2007)
49		Leila Amgoud, Souhila Kaci: An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge bases. Int. J. Approx. Reasoning 45(2): 321-340 (2007)
	2006
48		Leila Amgoud, Henri Prade: Explaining Qualitative Decision under Uncertainty by Argumentation. AAAI 2006: 219-224
47		Iyad Rahwan, Leila Amgoud: An argumentation based approach for practical reasoning. AAMAS 2006: 347-354
46		Leila Amgoud, Nabil Hameurlain: A formal model for designing dialogue strategies. AAMAS 2006: 414-416
45		Leila Amgoud, Souhila Kaci: On the Study of Negotiation Strategies. AC 2006: 150-163
44		Leila Amgoud, Sihem Belabbes, Henri Prade: A Formal General Setting for Dialogue Protocols. AIMSA 2006: 13-23
43		Leila Amgoud, Nabil Hameurlain: An Argumentation-Based Approach for Dialog Move Selection. ArgMAS 2006: 128-141
42		Iyad Rahwan, Leila Amgoud: An Argumentation-Based Approach for Practical Reasoning. ArgMAS 2006: 74-90
41		Leila Amgoud, Florence Dupin de Saint-Cyr: Towards ACL Semantics Based on Commitments and Penalties. ECAI 2006: 235-239
40		Leila Amgoud, Nabil Hameurlain: An Argumentation-Based Framework for Designing Dialogue Strategies. ECAI 2006: 713-714
39		Célia da Costa Pereira, Andrea Tettamanzi, Leila Amgoud: Goal Revision for a Rational Agent. ECAI 2006: 747-748
38		Leila Amgoud, Nabil Hameurlain: An Argumentation-based Approach for Dialog Move Selection. EUMAS 2006
	2005
37		Martin Caminada, Leila Amgoud: An Axiomatic Account of Formal Argumentation. AAAI 2005: 608-613
36		Leila Amgoud: Towards a formal model for task allocation via coalition formation. AAMAS 2005: 1185-1186
35		Leila Amgoud, Souhila Kaci: Strategical considerations for negotiating agents. AAMAS 2005: 1215-1216
34		Leila Amgoud, Henri Prade: Formal handling of threats and rewards in a negotiation dialogue. AAMAS 2005: 529-536
33		Leila Amgoud, Sihem Belabbes, Henri Prade: Towards a formal framework for the search of a consensus between autonomous agents. AAMAS 2005: 537-543
32		Leila Amgoud: An Argumentation-Based Model for Reasoning About Coalition Structures. ArgMAS 2005: 217-228
31		Leila Amgoud, Sihem Belabbes, Henri Prade: Towards a Formal Framework for the Search of a Consensus Between Autonomous Agents. ArgMAS 2005: 264-278
30		Leila Amgoud, Henri Prade: Formal Handling of Threats and Rewards in a Negotiation Dialogue. ArgMAS 2005: 88-103
29		Martin Caminada, Leila Amgoud: An Axiomatic Account of Formal Argumentation. BNAIC 2005: 327-328
28		Leila Amgoud, Jean-François Bonnefon, Henri Prade: An Argumentation-Based Approach to Multiple Criteria Decision. ECSQARU 2005: 269-280
27		Leila Amgoud, Souhila Kaci: An Argumentation Framework for Merging Conflicting Knowledge Bases: The Prioritized Case. ECSQARU 2005: 527-538
26		Leila Amgoud: A Unified Setting for Inference and Decision: An Argumentation-based Approach. UAI 2005: 26-33
25		Leila Amgoud, Henri Prade: Handling threats, rewards, and explanatory arguments in a unified setting. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 20(12): 1195-1218 (2005)
	2004
24		Leila Amgoud, Souhila Kaci: On the Generation of Bipolar Goals in Argumentation-Based Negotiation. ArgMAS 2004: 192-207
23		Leila Amgoud, Henri Prade: Reaching Agreement Through Argumentation: A Possibilistic Approach. KR 2004: 175-182
22		Leila Amgoud, Claudette Cayrol: On the Use of an ATMS for Handling Conflicting Desires. KR 2004: 194-202
21		Leila Amgoud, Claudette Cayrol, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex: On the bipolarity in argumentation frameworks. NMR 2004: 1-9
20		Leila Amgoud, Henri Prade: Generation and evaluation of different types of arguments in negotiation. NMR 2004: 10-15
19		Leila Amgoud, Henri Prade: Using Arguments for Making Decisions: A Possibilistic Logic Approach. UAI 2004: 10-17
	2003
18		Simon Parsons, Michael Wooldridge, Leila Amgoud: On the outcomes of formal inter-agent dialogues. AAMAS 2003: 616-623
17		Leila Amgoud: A Formal Framework for Handling Conflicting Desires. ECSQARU 2003: 552-563
16		Leila Amgoud, Henri Prade: A Possibilistic Logic Modeling of Autonomous Agents Negotiation. EPIA 2003: 360-365
15		Peter McBurney, Rogier M. van Eijk, Simon Parsons, Leila Amgoud: A Dialogue Game Protocol for Agent Purchase Negotiations. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 7(3): 235-273 (2003)
14		Simon Parsons, Michael Wooldridge, Leila Amgoud: Properties and Complexity of Some Formal Inter-agent Dialogues. J. Log. Comput. 13(3): 347-376 (2003)
	2002
13		Simon Parsons, Michael Wooldridge, Leila Amgoud: An analysis of formal inter-agent dialogues. AAMAS 2002: 394-401
12		Leila Amgoud, Nicolas Maudet, Simon Parsons: An argumentation-based Semantics for Agent Communication Languages. ECAI 2002: 38-42
11		Leila Amgoud, Simon Parsons: An Argumentation Framework for Merging Conflicting Knowledge Bases. JELIA 2002: 27-37
10		Leila Amgoud, Nicolas Maudet: Strategical considerations for argumentative agents (preliminary report). NMR 2002: 399-407
9		Leila Amgoud, Claudette Cayrol: A Reasoning Model Based on the Production of Acceptable Arguments. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 34(1-3): 197-215 (2002)
8		Leila Amgoud, Claudette Cayrol: Inferring from Inconsistency in Preference-Based Argumentation Frameworks. J. Autom. Reasoning 29(2): 125-169 (2002)
	2001
7		Leila Amgoud, Simon Parsons: Agent Dialogues with Conflicting Preferences. ATAL 2001: 190-205
	2000
6		Leila Amgoud, Simon Parsons, Nicolas Maudet: Arguments, Dialogue, and Negotiation. ECAI 2000: 338-342
5		Leila Amgoud, Nicolas Maudet, Simon Parsons: Modeling Dialogues Using Argumentation. ICMAS 2000: 31-38
	1998
4		Leila Amgoud: Using Preferences to Select Acceptable Arguments. ECAI 1998: 43-44
3		Leila Amgoud, Claudette Cayrol: On the Acceptability of Arguments in Preference-based Argumentation. UAI 1998: 1-7
	1997
2		Leila Amgoud, Claudette Cayrol: Integrating Preference Orderings into Argument-Based Reasoning. ECSQARU-FAPR 1997: 159-170
	1996
1		Leila Amgoud, Claudette Cayrol, Daniel Le Berre: Comparing Arguments Using Preference Ordering for Argument-Based Reasoning. ICTAI 1996: 400-403

Coauthor Index

1	Florence Bannay (Florence Dupin de Saint-Cyr)	[41] [58] [64] [71]
2	Sihem Belabbes	[31] [33] [44]
3	Daniel Le Berre	[1]
4	Philippe Besnard	[68] [74] [83]
5	Jean-François Bonnefon	[28] [53]
6	Jean-Rémi Bourguet	[76]
7	Martin Caminada	[29] [37] [50]
8	Claudette Cayrol	[1] [2] [3] [8] [9] [21] [22] [59]
9	Caroline Devred	[65] [66] [79] [82]
10	Yannis Dimopoulos	[55] [57] [61] [62] [63] [72]
11	Rogier M. van Eijk	[15]
12	Nabil Hameurlain	[38] [40] [43] [46]
13	Souhila Kaci	[24] [27] [35] [45] [49]
14	Antonis C. Kakas	[77]
15	Gabriele Kern-Isberner	[77]
16	Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex	[21] [59] [65] [66] [79]
17	P. Livet	[59]
18	Nicolas Maudet	[5] [6] [10] [12] [77]
19	Peter McBurney	[15]
20	Pavlos Moraitis	[55] [57] [61] [62] [63] [72] [77]
21	Simon Parsons	[5] [6] [7] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [18]
22	Célia da Costa Pereira	[39]
23	Henri Prade	[16] [19] [20] [23] [25] [28] [30] [31] [33] [34] [44] [48] [52] [53] [67]
24	Iyad Rahwan	[42] [47]
25	Mathieu Serrurier	[54] [56] [60]
26	V. S. Subrahmanian	[51]
27	Andrea Tettamanzi	[39]
28	Rallou Thomopoulos	[76]
29	Srdjan Vesic	[69] [70] [73] [75] [78] [80] [81] [83] [84] [85] [86]
30	Michael Wooldridge (Michael J. Wooldridge)	[13] [14] [18]

Colors in the list of coauthors

Last update Thu May 24 01:13:30 2012 CET by the DBLP Team — Data released under the ODC-BY 1.0 license — See also our legal information page