 | 2009 |
|---|
| 72 |       | Yannis Dimopoulos,
Pavlos Moraitis,
Leila Amgoud:
Extending Argumentation to Make Good Decisions.
ADT 2009: 225-236 |
| 71 | | Leila Amgoud,
Florence Dupin de Saint-Cyr:
Extracting the Core of a Persuasion Dialog to Evaluate Its Quality.
ECSQARU 2009: 59-70 |
| 70 | | Leila Amgoud,
Srdjan Vesic:
On Revising Argumentation-Based Decision Systems.
ECSQARU 2009: 71-82 |
| 69 | | Leila Amgoud,
Srdjan Vesic:
Repairing Preference-Based Argumentation Frameworks.
IJCAI 2009: 665-670 |
| 68 | | Leila Amgoud,
Philippe Besnard:
Bridging the Gap between Abstract Argumentation Systems and Logic.
SUM 2009: 12-27 |
| 67 | | Leila Amgoud,
Henri Prade:
Using arguments for making and explaining decisions.
Artif. Intell. 173(3-4): 413-436 (2009) |
| 2008 |
|---|
| 66 | | Leila Amgoud,
Caroline Devred,
Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex:
A constrained argumentation system for practical reasoning.
AAMAS (1) 2008: 429-436 |
| 65 | | Leila Amgoud,
Caroline Devred,
Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex:
A Constrained Argumentation System for Practical Reasoning.
ArgMAS 2008: 37-56 |
| 64 |  | Leila Amgoud,
Florence Dupin de Saint-Cyr:
On measuring persuasion dialogs quality.
COMMA 2008: 13-24 |
| 63 | | Yannis Dimopoulos,
Pavlos Moraitis,
Leila Amgoud:
Theoretical and Computational Properties of Preference-based Argumentation.
ECAI 2008: 463-467 |
| 62 | | Yannis Dimopoulos,
Pavlos Moraitis,
Leila Amgoud:
Characterizing the Outcomes of Argumentation-Based Integrative Negotiation.
IAT 2008: 456-460 |
| 61 | | Leila Amgoud,
Yannis Dimopoulos,
Pavlos Moraitis:
Making Decisions through Preference-Based Argumentation.
KR 2008: 113-123 |
| 60 | | Leila Amgoud,
Mathieu Serrurier:
Agents that argue and explain classifications.
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 16(2): 187-209 (2008) |
| 59 | | Leila Amgoud,
Claudette Cayrol,
Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex,
P. Livet:
On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks.
Int. J. Intell. Syst. 23(10): 1062-1093 (2008) |
| 58 | | Leila Amgoud,
Florence Dupin de Saint-Cyr:
A new semantics for ACL based on commitments and penalties.
Int. J. Intell. Syst. 23(3): 286-312 (2008) |
| 2007 |
|---|
| 57 | | Leila Amgoud,
Yannis Dimopoulos,
Pavlos Moraitis:
A unified and general framework for argumentation-based negotiation.
AAMAS 2007: 158 |
| 56 | | Leila Amgoud,
Mathieu Serrurier:
Arguing and explaining classifications.
AAMAS 2007: 160 |
| 55 | | Leila Amgoud,
Yannis Dimopoulos,
Pavlos Moraitis:
A General Framework for Argumentation-Based Negotiation.
ArgMAS 2007: 1-17 |
| 54 | | Leila Amgoud,
Mathieu Serrurier:
Arguing and Explaining Classifications.
ArgMAS 2007: 164-177 |
| 53 | | Leila Amgoud,
Jean-François Bonnefon,
Henri Prade:
The Logical Handling of Threats, Rewards, Tips, and Warnings.
ECSQARU 2007: 235-246 |
| 52 | | Leila Amgoud,
Henri Prade:
Formalizing Practical Reasoning Under Uncertainty: An Argumentation-Based Approach.
IAT 2007: 189-195 |
| 51 | | V. S. Subrahmanian,
Leila Amgoud:
A General Framework for Reasoning about Inconsistency.
IJCAI 2007: 599-504 |
| 50 | | Martin Caminada,
Leila Amgoud:
On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms.
Artif. Intell. 171(5-6): 286-310 (2007) |
| 49 | | Leila Amgoud,
Souhila Kaci:
An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge bases.
Int. J. Approx. Reasoning 45(2): 321-340 (2007) |
| 2006 |
|---|
| 48 | | Leila Amgoud,
Henri Prade:
Explaining Qualitative Decision under Uncertainty by Argumentation.
AAAI 2006 |
| 47 | | Iyad Rahwan,
Leila Amgoud:
An argumentation based approach for practical reasoning.
AAMAS 2006: 347-354 |
| 46 | | Leila Amgoud,
Nabil Hameurlain:
A formal model for designing dialogue strategies.
AAMAS 2006: 414-416 |
| 45 | | Leila Amgoud,
Souhila Kaci:
On the Study of Negotiation Strategies.
AC 2006: 150-163 |
| 44 | | Leila Amgoud,
Sihem Belabbes,
Henri Prade:
A Formal General Setting for Dialogue Protocols.
AIMSA 2006: 13-23 |
| 43 | | Leila Amgoud,
Nabil Hameurlain:
An Argumentation-Based Approach for Dialog Move Selection.
ArgMAS 2006: 128-141 |
| 42 | | Iyad Rahwan,
Leila Amgoud:
An Argumentation-Based Approach for Practical Reasoning.
ArgMAS 2006: 74-90 |
| 41 | | Leila Amgoud,
Florence Dupin de Saint-Cyr:
Towards ACL Semantics Based on Commitments and Penalties.
ECAI 2006: 235-239 |
| 40 | | Leila Amgoud,
Nabil Hameurlain:
An Argumentation-Based Framework for Designing Dialogue Strategies.
ECAI 2006: 713-714 |
| 39 | | Célia da Costa Pereira,
Andrea Tettamanzi,
Leila Amgoud:
Goal Revision for a Rational Agent.
ECAI 2006: 747-748 |
| 38 | | Leila Amgoud,
Nabil Hameurlain:
An Argumentation-based Approach for Dialog Move Selection.
EUMAS 2006 |
| 2005 |
|---|
| 37 | | Martin Caminada,
Leila Amgoud:
An Axiomatic Account of Formal Argumentation.
AAAI 2005: 608-613 |
| 36 | | Leila Amgoud:
Towards a formal model for task allocation via coalition formation.
AAMAS 2005: 1185-1186 |
| 35 | | Leila Amgoud,
Souhila Kaci:
Strategical considerations for negotiating agents.
AAMAS 2005: 1215-1216 |
| 34 | | Leila Amgoud,
Henri Prade:
Formal handling of threats and rewards in a negotiation dialogue.
AAMAS 2005: 529-536 |
| 33 | | Leila Amgoud,
Sihem Belabbes,
Henri Prade:
Towards a formal framework for the search of a consensus between autonomous agents.
AAMAS 2005: 537-543 |
| 32 | | Leila Amgoud:
An Argumentation-Based Model for Reasoning About Coalition Structures.
ArgMAS 2005: 217-228 |
| 31 | | Leila Amgoud,
Sihem Belabbes,
Henri Prade:
Towards a Formal Framework for the Search of a Consensus Between Autonomous Agents.
ArgMAS 2005: 264-278 |
| 30 | | Leila Amgoud,
Henri Prade:
Formal Handling of Threats and Rewards in a Negotiation Dialogue.
ArgMAS 2005: 88-103 |
| 29 | | Martin Caminada,
Leila Amgoud:
An Axiomatic Account of Formal Argumentation.
BNAIC 2005: 327-328 |
| 28 | | Leila Amgoud,
Jean-François Bonnefon,
Henri Prade:
An Argumentation-Based Approach to Multiple Criteria Decision.
ECSQARU 2005: 269-280 |
| 27 | | Leila Amgoud,
Souhila Kaci:
An Argumentation Framework for Merging Conflicting Knowledge Bases: The Prioritized Case.
ECSQARU 2005: 527-538 |
| 26 | | Leila Amgoud:
A Unified Setting for Inference and Decision: An Argumentation-based Approach.
UAI 2005: 26-33 |
| 25 | | Leila Amgoud,
Henri Prade:
Handling threats, rewards, and explanatory arguments in a unified setting.
Int. J. Intell. Syst. 20(12): 1195-1218 (2005) |
| 2004 |
|---|
| 24 | | Leila Amgoud,
Souhila Kaci:
On the Generation of Bipolar Goals in Argumentation-Based Negotiation.
ArgMAS 2004: 192-207 |
| 23 | | Leila Amgoud,
Henri Prade:
Reaching Agreement Through Argumentation: A Possibilistic Approach.
KR 2004: 175-182 |
| 22 | | Leila Amgoud,
Claudette Cayrol:
On the Use of an ATMS for Handling Conflicting Desires.
KR 2004: 194-202 |
| 21 | | Leila Amgoud,
Claudette Cayrol,
Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex:
On the bipolarity in argumentation frameworks.
NMR 2004: 1-9 |
| 20 | | Leila Amgoud,
Henri Prade:
Generation and evaluation of different types of arguments in negotiation.
NMR 2004: 10-15 |
| 19 | | Leila Amgoud,
Henri Prade:
Using Arguments for Making Decisions: A Possibilistic Logic Approach.
UAI 2004: 10-17 |
| 2003 |
|---|
| 18 | | Simon Parsons,
Michael Wooldridge,
Leila Amgoud:
On the outcomes of formal inter-agent dialogues.
AAMAS 2003: 616-623 |
| 17 | | Leila Amgoud:
A Formal Framework for Handling Conflicting Desires.
ECSQARU 2003: 552-563 |
| 16 | | Leila Amgoud,
Henri Prade:
A Possibilistic Logic Modeling of Autonomous Agents Negotiation.
EPIA 2003: 360-365 |
| 15 | | Peter McBurney,
Rogier M. van Eijk,
Simon Parsons,
Leila Amgoud:
A Dialogue Game Protocol for Agent Purchase Negotiations.
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 7(3): 235-273 (2003) |
| 14 | | Simon Parsons,
Michael Wooldridge,
Leila Amgoud:
Properties and Complexity of Some Formal Inter-agent Dialogues.
J. Log. Comput. 13(3): 347-376 (2003) |
| 2002 |
|---|
| 13 | | Simon Parsons,
Michael Wooldridge,
Leila Amgoud:
An analysis of formal inter-agent dialogues.
AAMAS 2002: 394-401 |
| 12 | | Leila Amgoud,
Nicolas Maudet,
Simon Parsons:
An argumentation-based Semantics for Agent Communication Languages.
ECAI 2002: 38-42 |
| 11 | | Leila Amgoud,
Simon Parsons:
An Argumentation Framework for Merging Conflicting Knowledge Bases.
JELIA 2002: 27-37 |
| 10 | | Leila Amgoud,
Nicolas Maudet:
Strategical considerations for argumentative agents (preliminary report).
NMR 2002: 399-407 |
| 9 | | Leila Amgoud,
Claudette Cayrol:
A Reasoning Model Based on the Production of Acceptable Arguments.
Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 34(1-3): 197-215 (2002) |
| 8 | | Leila Amgoud,
Claudette Cayrol:
Inferring from Inconsistency in Preference-Based Argumentation Frameworks.
J. Autom. Reasoning 29(2): 125-169 (2002) |
| 2001 |
|---|
| 7 | | Leila Amgoud,
Simon Parsons:
Agent Dialogues with Conflicting Preferences.
ATAL 2001: 190-205 |
| 2000 |
|---|
| 6 | | Leila Amgoud,
Simon Parsons,
Nicolas Maudet:
Arguments, Dialogue, and Negotiation.
ECAI 2000: 338-342 |
| 5 | | Leila Amgoud,
Nicolas Maudet,
Simon Parsons:
Modeling Dialogues Using Argumentation.
ICMAS 2000: 31-38 |
| 1998 |
|---|
| 4 | | Leila Amgoud:
Using Preferences to Select Acceptable Arguments.
ECAI 1998: 43-44 |
| 3 | | Leila Amgoud,
Claudette Cayrol:
On the Acceptability of Arguments in Preference-based Argumentation.
UAI 1998: 1-7 |
| 1997 |
|---|
| 2 | | Leila Amgoud,
Claudette Cayrol:
Integrating Preference Orderings into Argument-Based Reasoning.
ECSQARU-FAPR 1997: 159-170 |
| 1996 |
|---|
| 1 | | Leila Amgoud,
Claudette Cayrol,
Daniel Le Berre:
Comparing Arguments Using Preference Ordering for Argument-Based Reasoning.
ICTAI 1996: 400-403 |
