Kevin D. Ashley

	2011
88		Kevin D. Ashley, Tom M. van Engers: The 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Proceedings of the Conference, June 6-10, 2011, Pittsburgh, PA, USA ACM 2011
87		Ilya M. Goldin, Kevin D. Ashley: Peering Inside Peer Review with Bayesian Models. AIED 2011: 90-97
86		Matthias Grabmair, Kevin D. Ashley: Facilitating case comparison using value judgments and intermediate legal concepts. ICAIL 2011: 161-170
85		Bruce M. McLaren, Kevin D. Ashley: Can temporal representation and reasoning make a difference in automated legal reasoning?: lessons from an AI-based ethical reasoner. ICAIL 2011: 229-238
84		Kevin D. Ashley, Ilya M. Goldin: Toward AI-enhanced Computer-supported Peer Review in Legal Education. JURIX 2011: 3-12
83		Matthias Grabmair, Kevin D. Ashley, Rebecca Hwa, Patricia M. Sweeney: Toward Extracting Information from Public Health Statutes using Text Classification Machine Learning. JURIX 2011: 73-82
	2010
82		Ilya M. Goldin, Kevin D. Ashley: Eliciting Informative Feedback in Peer Review: Importance of Problem-Specific Scaffolding. Intelligent Tutoring Systems (1) 2010: 95-104
81		Matthias Grabmair, Kevin D. Ashley: Argumentation with Value Judgments - An Example of Hypothetical Reasoning. JURIX 2010: 67-76
80		Kevin D. Ashley, Will Bridewell: Emerging AI & Law approaches to automating analysis and retrieval of electronically stored information in discovery proceedings. Artif. Intell. Law 18(4): 311-320 (2010)
	2009
79		Niels Pinkwart, Collin Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven: Assessing Argument Diagrams in an Ill-defined Domain. AIED 2009: 590-592
78		Kevin D. Ashley: What a Legal CBR Ontology Should Provide. FLAIRS Conference 2009
77		Kevin D. Ashley: Ontological requirements for analogical, teleological, and hypothetical legal reasoning. ICAIL 2009: 1-10
76		Collin Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven: Toward assessing law students' argument diagrams. ICAIL 2009: 222-223
75		Matthias Grabmair, Kevin D. Ashley: Using critical questions to disambiguate and formalize statutory provisions. ICAIL 2009: 240-241
74		Kevin D. Ashley, Collin Lynch, Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven: Toward Modeling and Teaching Legal Case-Based Adaptation with Expert Examples. ICCBR 2009: 45-59
73		Collin Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven: Argument Diagramming and Diagnostic Reliability. JURIX 2009: 106-115
72		Kevin D. Ashley, Stefanie Brüninghaus: Automatically classifying case texts and predicting outcomes. Artif. Intell. Law 17(2): 125-165 (2009)
71		Kevin D. Ashley: Teaching a process model of legal argument with hypotheticals. Artif. Intell. Law 17(4): 321-370 (2009)
70		Collin Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven: Concepts, Structures, and Goals: Redefining Ill-Definedness. I. J. Artificial Intelligence in Education 19(3): 253-266 (2009)
69		Niels Pinkwart, Kevin D. Ashley, Collin Lynch, Vincent Aleven: Evaluating an Intelligent Tutoring System for Making Legal Arguments with Hypotheticals. I. J. Artificial Intelligence in Education 19(4): 401-424 (2009)
	2008
68		Collin Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven: Argument graph classification with Genetic Programming and C4.5. EDM 2008: 137-146
67		Kevin D. Ashley: Some Thoughts on Using Computers to Teach Argumentation. FLAIRS Conference 2008: 17
66		Niels Pinkwart, Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven, Collin Lynch: Graph Grammars: An ITS Technology for Diagram Representations. FLAIRS Conference 2008: 433-438
65		Niels Pinkwart, Collin Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven: Re-evaluating LARGO in the Classroom: Are Diagrams Better Than Text for Teaching Argumentation Skills?. Intelligent Tutoring Systems 2008: 90-100
64		Kevin D. Ashley, Collin Lynch, Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven: A Process Model of Legal Argument with Hypotheticals. JURIX 2008: 1-10
	2007
63		Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley, Collin Lynch: Evaluating Legal Argument Instruction with Graphical Representations Using LARGO. AIED 2007: 101-108
62		Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley, Collin Lynch, Niels Pinkwart: AIED Applications in Ill-Defined Domains. AIED 2007: 713
61		Kevin D. Ashley: Interpretive Reasoning with Hypothetical Cases. FLAIRS Conference 2007: 387-392
60		Kevin D. Ashley, Niels Pinkwart, Collin Lynch, Vincent Aleven: Learning by diagramming Supreme Court oral arguments. ICAIL 2007: 271-275
59		Niels Pinkwart, Collin Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven: Student's Usage of Multiple Linked Argument Representations in LARGO. Mensch & Computer 2007: 245-250
	2006
58		Mitsuru Ikeda, Kevin D. Ashley, Tak-Wai Chan: Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 8th International Conference, ITS 2006, Jhongli, Taiwan, June 26-30, 2006, Proceedings Springer 2006
57		Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Progress in Textual Case-Based Reasoning: Predicting the Outcome of Legal Cases from Text. AAAI 2006: 1577-1580
56		Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley, Collin Lynch: Schwachstellenermittlung und Rückmeldungsprinzipen in einem intelligenten Tutorensystem für juristische Argumentation. DeLFI 2006: 75-86
55		Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley, Collin Lynch: Toward Legal Argument Instruction with Graph Grammars and Collaborative Filtering Techniques. Intelligent Tutoring Systems 2006: 227-236
	2005
54		Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley: Toward supporting hypothesis formation and testing in an interpretive domain. AIED 2005: 732-734
53		Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley, Collin Lynch: Helping Law Students to Understand US Supreme Court Oral Arguments: A Planned Experiment. ICAIL 2005: 55-59
52		Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Generating Legal Arguments and Predictions from Case Texts. ICAIL 2005: 65-74
51		Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Reasoning with Textual Cases. ICCBR 2005: 137-151
50		Matthias Grabmair, Kevin D. Ashley: Towards Modeling Systematic Interpretation of Codified Law. JURIX 2005: 107-108
49		Rosina O. Weber, Kevin D. Ashley, Stefanie Brüninghaus: Textual case-based reasoning. Knowledge Eng. Review 20(3): 255-260 (2005)
48		Edwina L. Rissland, Kevin D. Ashley, Karl Branting: Case-based reasoning and law. Knowledge Eng. Review 20(3): 293-298 (2005)
	2003
47		Kevin D. Ashley, Derek G. Bridge: Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development, 5th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, ICCBR 2003, Trondheim, Norway, June 23-26, 2003, Proceedings Springer 2003
46		Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Experimental Design for Evaluating an AI and Law Program. Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems 2003: 10-13
45		Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Predicting Outcomes of Case-Based Legal Arguments. ICAIL 2003: 233-242
44		Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Combining Case-Based and Model-Based Reasoning for Predicting the Outcome of Legal Cases. ICCBR 2003: 65-79
43		Edwina L. Rissland, Kevin D. Ashley, Ronald Prescott Loui: AI and Law: A fruitful synergy. Artif. Intell. 150(1-2): 1-15 (2003)
42		Kevin D. Ashley, Edwina L. Rissland: Law, learning and representation. Artif. Intell. 150(1-2): 17-58 (2003)
	2002
41		Kevin D. Ashley, Ravi Desai, John M. Levine: Teaching Case-Based Argumentation Concepts Using Dialectic Arguments vs. Didactic Explanations. Intelligent Tutoring Systems 2002: 585-595
40		Kevin D. Ashley: An AI model of case-based legal argument from a jurisprudential viewpoint. Artif. Intell. Law 10(1-3): 163-218 (2002)
39		Edwina L. Rissland, Kevin D. Ashley: A note on dimensions and factors. Artif. Intell. Law 10(1-3): 65-77 (2002)
	2001
38		Kevin D. Ashley, Bruce M. McLaren: An AI investigation of citation's cognitive role. ICAIL 2001: 32-41
37		Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Improving the representation of legal case texts with information extraction methods. ICAIL 2001: 42-51
36		Ilya M. Goldin, Kevin D. Ashley, Rosa L. Pinkus: Introducing PETE: computer support for teaching ethics. ICAIL 2001: 94-98
35		Bruce M. McLaren, Kevin D. Ashley: Helping a CBR Program Know What It Knows. ICCBR 2001: 377-391
34		Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: The Role of Information Extraction for Textual CBR. ICCBR 2001: 74-89
	2000
33		Bruce M. McLaren, Kevin D. Ashley: Assessing Relevance with Extensionally Defined Principles and Cases. AAAI/IAAI 2000: 316-322
	1999
32		Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Toward adding knowledge to learning algorithms for indexing legal cases. ICAIL 1999: 9-17
31		Bruce M. McLaren, Kevin D. Ashley: Case Representation, Acquisition, and Retrieval in SIROCCO. ICCBR 1999: 248-262
30		Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Bootstrapping Case Base Development with Annotated Case Summaries. ICCBR 1999: 59-73
	1998
29		Bruce M. McLaren, Kevin D. Ashley: Exploring the Dialectic Between Abstract Rules and Concrete Facts: Operationalizing Principles and Cases in Engineering Ethics. EWCBR 1998: 37-51
	1997
28		Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Finding Factors: Learning to Classify Case Opinions Under Abstract Fact Categories. ICAIL 1997: 123-131
27		Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley: Evaluating a Learning Environment for Case-Based Argumentation Skills. ICAIL 1997: 170-179
26		Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Using Machine Learning for Assigning Indices to Textual Cases. ICCBR 1997: 303-314
25		Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven: Reasoning Symbolically About Partially Matched Cases. IJCAI (1) 1997: 335-341
	1996
24		Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley: How Different Is Different? Arguing About the Significance of Similarities and Differences. EWCBR 1996: 1-15
	1995
23		Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley: Doing Things with Factors. ICAIL 1995: 31-41
22		Bruce M. McLaren, Kevin D. Ashley: Context Sensitive Case Comparisons in Practical Ethics: Reasoning About Reasons. ICAIL 1995: 316-325
21		Kevin D. Ashley, Bruce M. McLaren: Reasoning with Reasons in Case-Based Comparisons. ICCBR 1995: 133-144
	1994
20		Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley: An Instructional Environment for Practicing Argumentation Skills. AAAI 1994: 485-492
19		Kevin D. Ashley, Bruce M. McLaren: A CBR Knowledge Representation for Practical Ethics. EWCBR 1994: 181-197
	1993
18		Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven: A Logical Representation for Relevance Criteria. EWCBR 1993: 338-352
17		Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley: What Law Students Need to Know to WIN. ICAIL 1993: 152-161
	1992
16		Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven: Generating Dialectical Examples Automatically. AAAI 1992: 654-660
15		Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley: Automated Generation of Examples for a Tutorial in Case-Based Argumentation. Intelligent Tutoring Systems 1992: 475-584
14		Kevin D. Ashley: Case-based reasoning and its implications for legal expert systems. Artif. Intell. Law 1(2-3): 113-208 (1992)
	1991
13		Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven: Toward an Intelligent Tutoring System for Teaching Law Students to Argue with Cases. ICAIL 1991: 42-52
12		Kevin D. Ashley: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals in HYPO. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 34(6): 753-796 (1991)
	1990
11		Kevin D. Ashley: Modeling legal argument - reasoning with cases and hypotheticals. MIT Press 1990: I-X, 1-329
	1989
10		Kevin D. Ashley: Toward a Computational Theory of Arguing with Precedents. ICAIL 1989: 93-102
9		Kevin D. Ashley: Defining Salience in Case-Based Arguments. IJCAI 1989: 537-542
	1988
8		Kevin D. Ashley, Edwina L. Rissland: Waiting on Weighting: A Symbolic Least Commitment Approach. AAAI 1988: 239-244
7		Kevin D. Ashley, Edwina L. Rissland: A Case-Based Approach to Modeling Legal Expertise. IEEE Expert 3(3): 70-77 (1988)
	1987
6		Kevin D. Ashley, Edwina L. Rissland: Compare and Contrast: A Test of Expertise. AAAI 1987: 273-278
5		Edwina L. Rissland, Kevin D. Ashley: A Case-Based System for Trade Secrets Law. ICAIL 1987: 60-66
4		Kevin D. Ashley, Edwina L. Rissland: But, See, Accord: Generating Blue Book Citations in HYPO. ICAIL 1987: 67-74
	1986
3		Edwina L. Rissland, Kevin D. Ashley: Hypotheticals as Heuristic Device. AAAI 1986: 289-297
2		Edwina L. Rissland, Kevin D. Ashley: Hypotheticals as Heuristic Device. HLT 1986
	1984
1		Edwina L. Rissland, Eduardo M. Valcarce, Kevin D. Ashley: Explaining and Arguing With Examples. AAAI 1984: 288-294

Coauthor Index

1	Vincent Aleven	[13] [15] [16] [17] [18] [20] [23] [24] [25] [27] [53] [54] [55] [56] [59] [60] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [68] [69] [70] [73] [74] [76] [79]
2	Karl Branting	[48]
3	Will Bridewell	[80]
4	Derek G. Bridge	[47]
5	Stefanie Brüninghaus	[26] [28] [30] [32] [34] [37] [44] [45] [46] [49] [51] [52] [57] [72]
6	Tak-Wai Chan	[58]
7	Ravi Desai	[41]
8	Tom M. van Engers	[88]
9	Ilya M. Goldin	[36] [82] [84] [87]
10	Matthias Grabmair	[50] [75] [81] [83] [86]
11	Rebecca Hwa	[83]
12	Mitsuru Ikeda	[58]
13	John M. Levine	[41]
14	Ronald Prescott Loui (Ron Loui)	[43]
15	Collin Lynch	[53] [55] [56] [59] [60] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [68] [69] [70] [73] [74] [76] [79]
16	Bruce M. McLaren	[19] [21] [22] [29] [31] [33] [35] [38] [85]
17	Rosa L. Pinkus	[36]
18	Niels Pinkwart	[55] [56] [59] [60] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [68] [69] [70] [73] [74] [76] [79]
19	Edwina L. Rissland	[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [39] [42] [43] [48]
20	Patricia M. Sweeney	[83]
21	Eduardo M. Valcarce	[1]
22	Rosina O. Weber (Rosina Weber, Rosina Weber-Lee)	[49]

Colors in the list of coauthors

Last update Thu May 24 01:13:30 2012 CET by the DBLP Team — Data released under the ODC-BY 1.0 license — See also our legal information page