 | 2009 |
|---|
| 19 |       | Lutz Bornmann,
Werner Marx,
Hermann Schier,
Erhard Rahm,
Andreas Thor,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Convergent validity of bibliometric Google Scholar data in the field of chemistry - Citation counts for papers that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or rejected but published elsewhere, using Google Scholar, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Chemical Abstracts.
J. Informetrics 3(1): 27-35 (2009) |
| 18 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Extent of type I and type II errors in editorial decisions: A case study on Angewandte Chemie International Edition.
J. Informetrics 3(4): 348-352 (2009) |
| 17 | | Christoph Neuhaus,
Werner Marx,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
The publication and citation impact profiles of Angewandte Chemie and the Journal of the American Chemical Society based on the sections of Chemical Abstracts: A case study on the limitations of the Journal Impact Factor.
JASIST 60(1): 176-183 (2009) |
| 16 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Rüdiger Mutz,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Do we need the h index and its variants in addition to standard bibliometric measures?
JASIST 60(6): 1286-1289 (2009) |
| 15 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Universality of citation distributions-A validation of Radicchi et al.'s relative indicator cf = c/c0 at the micro level using data from chemistry.
JASIST 60(8): 1664-1670 (2009) |
| 2008 |
|---|
| 14 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Rüdiger Mutz,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Latent Markov modeling applied to grant peer review.
J. Informetrics 2(3): 217-228 (2008) |
| 13 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Rüdiger Mutz,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
How to detect indications of potential sources of bias in peer review: A generalized latent variable modeling approach exemplified by a gender study.
J. Informetrics 2(4): 280-287 (2008) |
| 12 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review: A citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere.
JASIST 59(11): 1841-1852 (2008) |
| 11 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Rüdiger Mutz,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine.
JASIST 59(5): 830-837 (2008) |
| 2007 |
|---|
| 10 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Gatekeepers of science - Effects of external reviewers' attributes on the assessments of fellowship applications.
J. Informetrics 1(1): 83-91 (2007) |
| 9 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Convergent validation of peer review decisions using the h index: Extent of and reasons for type I and type II errors.
J. Informetrics 1(3): 204-213 (2007) |
| 8 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Rüdiger Mutz,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis.
J. Informetrics 1(3): 226-238 (2007) |
| 7 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Multiple publication on a single research study: Does it pay? The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine.
JASIST 58(8): 1100-1107 (2007) |
| 6 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
What do we know about the h index?
JASIST 58(9): 1381-1385 (2007) |
| 5 | | Christoph Neuhaus,
Andreas Litscher,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Using scripts to streamline citation analysis on STN International.
Scientometrics 71(1): 145-150 (2007) |
| 4 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Rüdiger Mutz,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Row-column (RC) association model applied to grant peer review.
Scientometrics 73(2): 139-147 (2007) |
| 2006 |
|---|
| 3 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review - A citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicants.
Scientometrics 68(3): 427-440 (2006) |
| 2005 |
|---|
| 2 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions.
Scientometrics 63(2): 297-320 (2005) |
| 1 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?
Scientometrics 65(3): 391-392 (2005) |
