 | 2007 |
|---|
| 10 |       | Yun Chen,
Maria Kutar,
Andy Hamilton:
Modelling and Matching: A Methodology for ePlanning System Development to Address the Requirements of Multiple User Groups.
HCI (15) 2007: 41-49 |
| 2005 |
|---|
| 9 | | Maria Kutar,
Ben Light:
Exploring Cultural Issues in the Packaged Software Industry: A Usability Perspective.
ECIS 2005 |
| 8 | | Jennifer Swan,
Trevor Barker,
Carol Britton,
Maria Kutar:
An empirical study of factors that affect user performance when using UML interaction diagrams.
ISESE 2005: 346-355 |
| 2004 |
|---|
| 7 | | Jennifer Swan,
Maria Kutar,
Trevor Barker,
Carol Britton:
User Preference and Performance with UML Interaction Diagrams.
VL/HCC 2004: 243-250 |
| 2002 |
|---|
| 6 | | Carol Britton,
Maria Kutar,
Sue Anthony,
Trevor Barker,
Sarah Beecham,
Vitoria Wilkinson:
An Empirical Study of User Preference and Performance with UML Diagrams.
HCC 2002: 31-33 |
| 5 | | Carol Britton,
Maria Kutar,
Sue Anthony,
Trevor Barker,
Sarah Beecham,
Vitoria Wilkinson:
An Empirical Study of User Preference and Performance with UML Diagrams.
IEEE Symposia on Human Centric Computing Languages and Environments 2002: 31-33 |
| 2001 |
|---|
| 4 | | Alan F. Blackwell,
Carol Britton,
Anna Louise Cox,
Thomas R. G. Green,
Corin A. Gurr,
Gada F. Kadoda,
Maria Kutar,
Martin Loomes,
Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,
Marian Petre,
Chris Roast,
Chris Roe,
Allan Wong,
R. Michael Young:
Cognitive Dimensions of Notations: Design Tools for Cognitive Technology.
Cognitive Technology 2001: 325-341 |
| 3 | | Maria Kutar,
Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,
Carol Britton,
Sara Jones:
The Cognitive Dimensions of an Artifact vis-à-vis Individual Human Users: Studies with Notations for the Temporal Specification of Interactive Systems.
Cognitive Technology 2001: 342-355 |
| 2000 |
|---|
| 2 | | Maria Kutar,
Carol Britton,
Chrystopher L. Nehaniv:
Specifying Multiple Time Granularities in Interactive Systems.
DSV-IS 2000: 51-63 |
| 1 | | Carol Britton,
Sara Jones,
Maria Kutar,
Martin Loomes,
Brian Robinson:
Evaluating the Intelligibility of Diagrammatic Languages Used in the Specification of Software.
Diagrams 2000: 376-391 |
