 | 2009 |
|---|
| 58 |       | Sindhu Joseph,
Henry Prakken:
Coherence-driven argumentation to norm consensus.
ICAIL 2009: 58-67 |
| 57 | | Jürgen Dix,
Simon Parsons,
Henry Prakken,
Guillermo Ricardo Simari:
Research challenges for argumentation.
Computer Science - R&D 23(1): 27-34 (2009) |
| 2008 |
|---|
| 56 | | Thomas L. van der Weide,
Frank Dignum,
John-Jules Ch. Meyer,
Henry Prakken,
Gerard Vreeswijk:
Personality-Based Practical Reasoning.
ArgMAS 2008: 3-18 |
| 55 |  | Sanjay Modgil,
Henry Prakken:
Applying Preferences to Dialogue Graphs.
COMMA 2008: 252-263 |
| 54 | | Régis Riveret,
Henry Prakken,
Antonino Rotolo,
Giovanni Sartor:
Heuristics in Argumentation: A Game Theory Investigation.
COMMA 2008: 324-335 |
| 53 | | Floris Bex,
Henry Prakken:
Investigating Stories in a Formal Dialogue Game.
COMMA 2008: 73-84 |
| 52 | | Henry Prakken:
Combining Modes of Reasoning: An Application of Abstract Argumentation.
JELIA 2008: 349-361 |
| 51 | | Susan W. van den Braak,
Herre van Oostendorp,
Henry Prakken,
Gerard Vreeswijk:
Representing narrative and testimonial knowledge in sense-making software for crime analysis.
JURIX 2008: 160-169 |
| 50 | | Henry Prakken,
Giovanni Sartor:
More on Presumptions and Burdens of Proof.
JURIX 2008: 176-185 |
| 49 | | Henry Prakken:
A formal model of adjudication dialogues.
Artif. Intell. Law 16(3): 305-328 (2008) |
| 48 | | Henry Prakken:
Formalising ordinary legal disputes: a case study.
Artif. Intell. Law 16(4): 333-359 (2008) |
| 47 | | Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,
Henry Prakken:
Introducing the Logic and Law Corner.
J. Log. Comput. 18(1): 1-12 (2008) |
| 2007 |
|---|
| 46 | | F. J. Bex,
Henry Prakken,
Bart Verheij:
Formalising argumentative story-based analysis of evidence.
ICAIL 2007: 1-10 |
| 45 | | Susan W. van den Braak,
Gerard Vreeswijk,
Henry Prakken:
AVERs: an argument visualization tool for representing stories about evidence.
ICAIL 2007: 11-15 |
| 44 | | Pieter Dijkstra,
Henry Prakken,
Kees de Vey Mestdagh:
An implementation of norm-based agent negotiation.
ICAIL 2007: 167-175 |
| 43 | | Jobien Sombekke,
Tom M. van Engers,
Henry Prakken:
Argumentation structures in legal dossiers.
ICAIL 2007: 277-281 |
| 42 | | Henry Prakken,
Giovanni Sartor:
Formalising arguments about the burden of persuasion.
ICAIL 2007: 97-106 |
| 41 | | Régis Riveret,
Antonino Rotolo,
Giovanni Sartor,
Henry Prakken,
Bram Roth:
Success chances in argument games: a probabilistic approach to legal disputes.
JURIX 2007: 99-108 |
| 40 | | Thomas F. Gordon,
Henry Prakken,
Douglas Walton:
The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof.
Artif. Intell. 171(10-15): 875-896 (2007) |
| 2006 |
|---|
| 39 | | Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,
Henry Prakken:
Justifying Actions by Accruing Arguments.
COMMA 2006: 247-258 |
| 38 | | Henry Prakken:
Combining sceptical epistemic reasoning with credulous practical reasoning.
COMMA 2006: 311-322 |
| 37 | | Floris Bex,
Henry Prakken,
Bart Verhey:
Anchored Narratives in Reasoning about Evidence.
JURIX 2006: 11-20 |
| 36 | | Henry Prakken,
Giovanni Sartor:
Presumptions and Burdens of Proof.
JURIX 2006: 21-30 |
| 35 | | Henry Prakken:
Formal systems for persuasion dialogue.
Knowledge Eng. Review 21(2): 163-188 (2006) |
| 2005 |
|---|
| 34 | | Jelle van Veenen,
Henry Prakken:
A verifiable protocol for arguing about rejections in negotiation.
AAMAS 2005: 1165-1166 |
| 33 | | Jelle van Veenen,
Henry Prakken:
A Protocol for Arguing About Rejections in Negotiation.
ArgMAS 2005: 138-153 |
| 32 | | Henry Prakken,
Chris Reed,
Douglas Walton:
Dialogues about the burden of proof.
ICAIL 2005: 115-124 |
| 31 | | Henry Prakken:
A study of accrual of arguments, with applications to evidential reasoning.
ICAIL 2005: 85-94 |
| 30 | | Pieter Dijkstra,
Floris Bex,
Henry Prakken,
Kees de Vey Mestdagh:
Towards a multi-agent system for regulated information exchange in crime investigations.
Artif. Intell. Law 13(1): 133-151 (2005) |
| 29 | | Henry Prakken:
Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation.
J. Log. Comput. 15(6): 1009-1040 (2005) |
| 2003 |
|---|
| 28 | | Hugo de Bruin,
Henry Prakken,
Jörgen S. Svensson:
The use of legal knowledge-based systems in public administration: what can go wrong?
Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems 2003: 14-16 |
| 27 | | Henry Prakken,
Chris Reed,
Douglas Walton:
Argumentation Schemes and Generalizations in Reasoning about Evidence.
ICAIL 2003: 32-41 |
| 26 | | Floris Bex,
Henry Prakken,
Chris Reed,
Douglas Walton:
Towards a Formal Account of Reasoning about Evidence: Argumentation Schemes and Generalisations.
Artif. Intell. Law 11(2-3): 125-165 (2003) |
| 25 | | Gerhard Brewka,
Henry Prakken,
Gerard Vreeswijk:
Special Issue on Computational Dialectics: an Introduction.
J. Log. Comput. 13(3): 317-318 (2003) |
| 2002 |
|---|
| 24 | | Henry Prakken,
Giovanni Sartor:
The Role of Logic in Computational Models of Legal Argument: A Critical Survey.
Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond 2002: 342-381 |
| 23 | | Henry Prakken:
Intuitions and the modelling of defeasible reasoning: some case studies.
NMR 2002: 91-102 |
| 22 | | Henry Prakken:
An exercise in formalising teleological case-based reasoning.
Artif. Intell. Law 10(1-3): 113-133 (2002) |
| 21 | | Henry Prakken:
Intuitions and the modelling of defeasible reasoning: some case studies
CoRR cs.AI/0207031: (2002) |
| 2001 |
|---|
| 20 | | Henry Prakken:
Modelling reasoning about evidence in legal procedure.
ICAIL 2001: 119-128 |
| 19 | | Henry Prakken:
Modelling Defeasibility in Law: Logic or Procedure?
Fundam. Inform. 48(2-3): 253-271 (2001) |
| 2000 |
|---|
| 18 | | Henry Prakken:
On Dialogue Systems with Speech Acts, Arguments, and Counterarguments.
JELIA 2000: 224-238 |
| 17 | | Gerard Vreeswijk,
Henry Prakken:
Credulous and Sceptical Argument Games for Preferred Semantics.
JELIA 2000: 239-253 |
| 16 | | Eveline T. Feteris,
Henry Prakken:
Introduction: Dialectical legal argument: Formal and informal models.
Artif. Intell. Law 8(2/3): 107-113 (2000) |
| 1999 |
|---|
| 15 | | Henry Prakken,
Thomas F. Gordon:
Rules of Order for Electronic Group Decision Making - A Formalization Methodology.
Collaboration between Human and Artificial Societies 1999: 246-263 |
| 14 | | Henry Prakken,
Giovanni Sartor:
A System for Defeasible Argumentation, with Defeasible Priorities.
Artificial Intelligence Today 1999: 365-379 |
| 1998 |
|---|
| 13 | | Henry Prakken,
Giovanni Sartor:
Modelling Reasoning with Precedents in a Formal Dialogue Game.
Artif. Intell. Law 6(2-4): 231-287 (1998) |
| 1997 |
|---|
| 12 | | Henry Prakken,
Giovanni Sartor:
Reasoning with Precedents in a Dialogue Game.
ICAIL 1997: 1-9 |
| 11 | | Henry Prakken:
Dialectical Proof Theory for Defeasible Argumentation with Defeasible Priorities (Preliminary Report).
ModelAge Workshop 1997: 202-215 |
| 10 | | Henry Prakken,
Giovanni Sartor:
Argument-Based Extended Logic Programming with Defeasible Priorities.
Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 7(1): (1997) |
| 1996 |
|---|
| 9 | | Henry Prakken,
Giovanni Sartor:
A System for Defeasible Argumentation, with Defeasible Priorities.
FAPR 1996: 510-524 |
| 8 | | Henry Prakken,
Giovanni Sartor:
A Dialectical Model of Assessing Conflicting Arguments in Legal Reasoning.
Artif. Intell. Law 4(3-4): 331-368 (1996) |
| 7 | | Henry Prakken:
Two Approaches to the Formalisation of Defeasible Deontic Reasoning.
Studia Logica 57(1): 73-90 (1996) |
| 6 | | Henry Prakken,
Marek J. Sergot:
Contrary-to-Duty Obligations.
Studia Logica 57(1): 91-115 (1996) |
| 1995 |
|---|
| 5 | | Henry Prakken,
Giovanni Sartor:
On the Relation Between Legal Language and Legal Argument: Assumptions, Applicability and Dynamic Priorities.
ICAIL 1995: 1-10 |
| 4 | | Henry Prakken:
From Logic to Dialectics in Legal Argument.
ICAIL 1995: 165-174 |
| 1993 |
|---|
| 3 | | Henry Prakken:
A Logical Framework for Modelling Legal Argument.
ICAIL 1993: 1-9 |
| 2 | | Henry Prakken:
An Argumentation Framework in Default Logic.
Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 9(1-2): 93-132 (1993) |
| 1991 |
|---|
| 1 | | Henry Prakken:
A Tool in Modelling Disagreement in Law: Preferring the Most Specific Argument.
ICAIL 1991: 165-174 |
