Kevin D. Ashley

Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Michal Araszkiewicz, Kevin D. Ashley, Katie Atkinson, Floris Bex, Filipe Borges, Danièle Bourcier, Paul Bourgine, Jack G. Conrad, Enrico Francesconi, Thomas F. Gordon, Guido Governatori, Jochen L. Leidner, David D. Lewis, Ronald Prescott Loui, L. Thorne McCarty, Henry Prakken, Frank Schilder, Erich Schweighofer, Paul Thompson, Alex Tyrrell, Bart Verheij, Douglas N. Walton, Adam Zachary Wyner: A history of AI and Law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on AI and Law. Artif. Intell. Law 20(3): 215-319 (2012)

Collin Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Mohammad Hassan Falakmasir: Comparing Argument Diagrams. JURIX 2012: 81-90

Ilya M. Goldin, Kevin D. Ashley: Peering Inside Peer Review with Bayesian Models. AIED 2011: 90-97

Matthias Grabmair, Kevin D. Ashley: Facilitating case comparison using value judgments and intermediate legal concepts. ICAIL 2011: 161-170

Bruce M. McLaren, Kevin D. Ashley: Can temporal representation and reasoning make a difference in automated legal reasoning?: lessons from an AI-based ethical reasoner. ICAIL 2011: 229-238

Kevin D. Ashley, Ilya M. Goldin: Toward AI-enhanced Computer-supported Peer Review in Legal Education. JURIX 2011: 3-12

Matthias Grabmair, Kevin D. Ashley, Rebecca Hwa, Patricia M. Sweeney: Toward Extracting Information from Public Health Statutes using Text Classification Machine Learning. JURIX 2011: 73-82

Kevin D. Ashley, Tom M. van Engers (Eds.): The 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Proceedings of the Conference, June 6-10, 2011, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. ACM 2011, isbn 978-1-4503-0755-0

Kevin D. Ashley, Will Bridewell: Emerging AI & Law approaches to automating analysis and retrieval of electronically stored information in discovery proceedings. Artif. Intell. Law 18(4): 311-320 (2010)

Ilya M. Goldin, Kevin D. Ashley: Eliciting Informative Feedback in Peer Review: Importance of Problem-Specific Scaffolding. Intelligent Tutoring Systems (1) 2010: 95-104

Matthias Grabmair, Kevin D. Ashley: Argumentation with Value Judgments - An Example of Hypothetical Reasoning. JURIX 2010: 67-76

Collin Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven: Concepts, Structures, and Goals: Redefining Ill-Definedness. I. J. Artificial Intelligence in Education 19(3): 253-266 (2009)

Niels Pinkwart, Kevin D. Ashley, Collin Lynch, Vincent Aleven: Evaluating an Intelligent Tutoring System for Making Legal Arguments with Hypotheticals. I. J. Artificial Intelligence in Education 19(4): 401-424 (2009)

Kevin D. Ashley, Stefanie Brüninghaus: Automatically classifying case texts and predicting outcomes. Artif. Intell. Law 17(2): 125-165 (2009)

Kevin D. Ashley: Teaching a process model of legal argument with hypotheticals. Artif. Intell. Law 17(4): 321-370 (2009)

Niels Pinkwart, Collin Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven: Assessing Argument Diagrams in an Ill-defined Domain. AIED 2009: 590-592

Kevin D. Ashley: What a Legal CBR Ontology Should Provide. FLAIRS Conference 2009

Kevin D. Ashley: Ontological requirements for analogical, teleological, and hypothetical legal reasoning. ICAIL 2009: 1-10

Collin Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven: Toward assessing law students' argument diagrams. ICAIL 2009: 222-223

Matthias Grabmair, Kevin D. Ashley: Using critical questions to disambiguate and formalize statutory provisions. ICAIL 2009: 240-241

Kevin D. Ashley, Collin Lynch, Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven: Toward Modeling and Teaching Legal Case-Based Adaptation with Expert Examples. ICCBR 2009: 45-59

Collin Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven: Argument Diagramming and Diagnostic Reliability. JURIX 2009: 106-115

Collin Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven: Argument graph classification with Genetic Programming and C4.5. EDM 2008: 137-146

Kevin D. Ashley: Some Thoughts on Using Computers to Teach Argumentation. FLAIRS Conference 2008: 17

Niels Pinkwart, Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven, Collin Lynch: Graph Grammars: An ITS Technology for Diagram Representations. FLAIRS Conference 2008: 433-438

Niels Pinkwart, Collin Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven: Re-evaluating LARGO in the Classroom: Are Diagrams Better Than Text for Teaching Argumentation Skills?. Intelligent Tutoring Systems 2008: 90-100

Kevin D. Ashley, Collin Lynch, Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven: A Process Model of Legal Argument with Hypotheticals. JURIX 2008: 1-10

Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley, Collin Lynch: Evaluating Legal Argument Instruction with Graphical Representations Using LARGO. AIED 2007: 101-108

Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley, Collin Lynch, Niels Pinkwart: AIED Applications in Ill-Defined Domains. AIED 2007: 713

Kevin D. Ashley: Interpretive Reasoning with Hypothetical Cases. FLAIRS Conference 2007: 387-392

Kevin D. Ashley, Niels Pinkwart, Collin Lynch, Vincent Aleven: Learning by diagramming Supreme Court oral arguments. ICAIL 2007: 271-275

Niels Pinkwart, Collin Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven: Student's Usage of Multiple Linked Argument Representations in LARGO. Mensch & Computer 2007: 245-250

Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Progress in Textual Case-Based Reasoning: Predicting the Outcome of Legal Cases from Text. AAAI 2006: 1577-1580

Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley, Collin Lynch: Schwachstellenermittlung und Rückmeldungsprinzipen in einem intelligenten Tutorensystem für juristische Argumentation. DeLFI 2006: 75-86

Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley, Collin Lynch: Toward Legal Argument Instruction with Graph Grammars and Collaborative Filtering Techniques. Intelligent Tutoring Systems 2006: 227-236

Mitsuru Ikeda, Kevin D. Ashley, Tak-Wai Chan (Eds.): Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 8th International Conference, ITS 2006, Jhongli, Taiwan, June 26-30, 2006, Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4053, Springer 2006, isbn 3-540-35159-0

Rosina O. Weber, Kevin D. Ashley, Stefanie Brüninghaus: Textual case-based reasoning. Knowledge Eng. Review 20(3): 255-260 (2005)

Edwina L. Rissland, Kevin D. Ashley, Karl Branting: Case-based reasoning and law. Knowledge Eng. Review 20(3): 293-298 (2005)

Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley: Toward supporting hypothesis formation and testing in an interpretive domain. AIED 2005: 732-734

Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley, Collin Lynch: Helping Law Students to Understand US Supreme Court Oral Arguments: A Planned Experiment. ICAIL 2005: 55-59

Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Generating Legal Arguments and Predictions from Case Texts. ICAIL 2005: 65-74

Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Reasoning with Textual Cases. ICCBR 2005: 137-151

Matthias Grabmair, Kevin D. Ashley: Towards Modeling Systematic Interpretation of Codified Law. JURIX 2005: 107-108

Edwina L. Rissland, Kevin D. Ashley, Ronald Prescott Loui: AI and Law: A fruitful synergy. Artif. Intell. 150(1-2): 1-15 (2003)

Kevin D. Ashley, Edwina L. Rissland: Law, learning and representation. Artif. Intell. 150(1-2): 17-58 (2003)

Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Experimental Design for Evaluating an AI and Law Program. Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems 2003: 10-13

Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Predicting Outcomes of Case-Based Legal Arguments. ICAIL 2003: 233-242

Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Combining Case-Based and Model-Based Reasoning for Predicting the Outcome of Legal Cases. ICCBR 2003: 65-79

Kevin D. Ashley, Derek G. Bridge (Eds.): Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development, 5th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, ICCBR 2003, Trondheim, Norway, June 23-26, 2003, Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2689, Springer 2003, isbn 3-540-40433-3

Edwina L. Rissland, Kevin D. Ashley: A note on dimensions and factors. Artif. Intell. Law 10(1-3): 65-77 (2002)

Kevin D. Ashley: An AI model of case-based legal argument from a jurisprudential viewpoint. Artif. Intell. Law 10(1-3): 163-218 (2002)

Kevin D. Ashley, Ravi Desai, John M. Levine: Teaching Case-Based Argumentation Concepts Using Dialectic Arguments vs. Didactic Explanations. Intelligent Tutoring Systems 2002: 585-595

Kevin D. Ashley, Bruce M. McLaren: An AI investigation of citation's cognitive role. ICAIL 2001: 32-41

Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Improving the representation of legal case texts with information extraction methods. ICAIL 2001: 42-51

Ilya M. Goldin, Kevin D. Ashley, Rosa L. Pinkus: Introducing PETE: computer support for teaching ethics. ICAIL 2001: 94-98

Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: The Role of Information Extraction for Textual CBR. ICCBR 2001: 74-89

Bruce M. McLaren, Kevin D. Ashley: Helping a CBR Program Know What It Knows. ICCBR 2001: 377-391

Bruce M. McLaren, Kevin D. Ashley: Assessing Relevance with Extensionally Defined Principles and Cases. AAAI/IAAI 2000: 316-322

Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Toward adding knowledge to learning algorithms for indexing legal cases. ICAIL 1999: 9-17

Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Bootstrapping Case Base Development with Annotated Case Summaries. ICCBR 1999: 59-73

Bruce M. McLaren, Kevin D. Ashley: Case Representation, Acquisition, and Retrieval in SIROCCO. ICCBR 1999: 248-262

Bruce M. McLaren, Kevin D. Ashley: Exploring the Dialectic Between Abstract Rules and Concrete Facts: Operationalizing Principles and Cases in Engineering Ethics. EWCBR 1998: 37-51

Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Finding Factors: Learning to Classify Case Opinions Under Abstract Fact Categories. ICAIL 1997: 123-131

Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley: Evaluating a Learning Environment for Case-Based Argumentation Skills. ICAIL 1997: 170-179

Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Using Machine Learning for Assigning Indices to Textual Cases. ICCBR 1997: 303-314

Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven: Reasoning Symbolically About Partially Matched Cases. IJCAI (1) 1997: 335-341

Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley: How Different Is Different? Arguing About the Significance of Similarities and Differences. EWCBR 1996: 1-15

Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley: Doing Things with Factors. ICAIL 1995: 31-41

Bruce M. McLaren, Kevin D. Ashley: Context Sensitive Case Comparisons in Practical Ethics: Reasoning About Reasons. ICAIL 1995: 316-325

Kevin D. Ashley, Bruce M. McLaren: Reasoning with Reasons in Case-Based Comparisons. ICCBR 1995: 133-144

Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley: An Instructional Environment for Practicing Argumentation Skills. AAAI 1994: 485-492

Kevin D. Ashley, Bruce M. McLaren: A CBR Knowledge Representation for Practical Ethics. EWCBR 1994: 181-197

Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven: A Logical Representation for Relevance Criteria. EWCBR 1993: 338-352

Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley: What Law Students Need to Know to WIN. ICAIL 1993: 152-161

Kevin D. Ashley: Case-based reasoning and its implications for legal expert systems. Artif. Intell. Law 1(2-3): 113-208 (1992)

Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven: Generating Dialectical Examples Automatically. AAAI 1992: 654-660

Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley: Automated Generation of Examples for a Tutorial in Case-Based Argumentation. Intelligent Tutoring Systems 1992: 475-584

Kevin D. Ashley: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals in HYPO. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 34(6): 753-796 (1991)

Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven: Toward an Intelligent Tutoring System for Teaching Law Students to Argue with Cases. ICAIL 1991: 42-52

Kevin D. Ashley: Modeling legal argument - reasoning with cases and hypotheticals. Artificial intelligence and legal reasoning, MIT Press 1990, isbn 978-0-262-01114-3, pp. I-X, 1-329

Kevin D. Ashley: Toward a Computational Theory of Arguing with Precedents. ICAIL 1989: 93-102

Kevin D. Ashley: Defining Salience in Case-Based Arguments. IJCAI 1989: 537-542

Kevin D. Ashley, Edwina L. Rissland: A Case-Based Approach to Modeling Legal Expertise. IEEE Expert 3(3): 70-77 (1988)

Kevin D. Ashley, Edwina L. Rissland: Waiting on Weighting: A Symbolic Least Commitment Approach. AAAI 1988: 239-244

Kevin D. Ashley, Edwina L. Rissland: Compare and Contrast: A Test of Expertise. AAAI 1987: 273-278

Edwina L. Rissland, Kevin D. Ashley: A Case-Based System for Trade Secrets Law. ICAIL 1987: 60-66

Kevin D. Ashley, Edwina L. Rissland: But, See, Accord: Generating Blue Book Citations in HYPO. ICAIL 1987: 67-74

Edwina L. Rissland, Kevin D. Ashley: Hypotheticals as Heuristic Device. AAAI 1986: 289-297

Edwina L. Rissland, Kevin D. Ashley: Hypotheticals as Heuristic Device. HLT 1986

Edwina L. Rissland, Eduardo M. Valcarce, Kevin D. Ashley: Explaining and Arguing With Examples. AAAI 1984: 288-294